lazyfarmer wrote:Lets add at least 6 supervisor, plus a manager,secretaries, all who need to be paid more then the workers,so thast is another almost million.
And now we're copying the bloated CFIA model.
Why 6 supervisors, one should be able to oversee the scheduling of 60 employees, and why a secretary?
employees should be able to print and fill out their own paperwork and submit it to the supervisor via email. Keep in mind that very few of our provincial plants are operating 8 hours a day 5 days a week. There is ample time to fill out the paperwork required.
rosewood wrote:I was thinking along the same line as you, Lazyfarmer. While there is a proposal of random inspections, the majority of inspections are to be self inspections by an employee. If we continue with the drivers on the highway, the idea is you catch yourself speeding and phone the police to be punished.
And having the employees take responsibility for and ensure a safe product worked really well for XL didn't it? Actually the issue there was more greed on the part of the owner/manager. They didn't care as long as the absolute most meat went through their plant, which meant more money for them. For the most part dollars are what's driving any business, and as we've recently seen with XL (and it's certainly not the only plant who operates with this same mentality). Owners will forego cleanliness and food safety in exchange for money.
No matter how well the staff is trained to recognize problems and illness, if the manager/owner says "no that's perfectly good stuff, put it through". The employee is going to do what they're told to keep their job.
And that is why we cannot allow anyone other than some third party (not paid by the plant) to monitor the meat safety.