[quote="Schipperkesue"]When I was in University we were told that when teaching art to elementary students, it is the process, not the product that is the most satisfying to children. In other words, in the children's minds, the act of creating art is far more important than the piece of art they produce.
quote]
I started my Ed degree at the same university at about the same time. We were also told that if you were an interesting teacher with fun lessons, then you did not need classroom management skills.
HORSE FEATHERS!... to both. I believe that it about payoff..
I think that to some people the product is all important, however the product might not be the "best" animal. To them it is not the proud ownership of great animals, but the accolades, admiration and awards they afford. It is more important to get the attention.That is the end product. This type of person is regularly seen in horse, dog and even cat shows. They buy the best, have a pro handler take them to Number one, then move onto the next "winner" dog. With others the professed love of process is actually the goal of product, but not in having the best end result birds, but in having cute of chicks or large flocks of adults, or quantities of eggs. This would be the quantity over quality type, although this does not exclude a sincere effort towards quality.
I think that others who seem to "get lost in the process" are actually receiving their payoff through the various aspects of the process, they enjoy the steps and small payoffs along the way.
So, as for process being more important than product, I think that the process is terminally unrewarding if there is no payoff in the product. If painting is fun The process of any action is enjoyable as long as the payoff is relatively greater than something else. The process and can BE the product, the product being bright colours to look at, or the feeling of fingepaint. Diminishing returns keeps most from going too far with any specific process. A person may enjoy the first few chocolates, but subsequent ones become less relatively enjoyable and eventually may become a negative experience. Generally people will stop early on, when the enjoyment level starts to diminish. If a child is painting and has a goal in mind but is unable to acheive the goal (product) then frustration (diminishing returns) eventually makes the process less important than the product.
I think it is this way for most people. Most people have a goal in mind, be it the best birds, or lots of chicks, or improving a breed/line, or producing eggs, the sence of wellbeing/calm/relaxation from watching/tending the flock, or a combination of the aforementioned etc. If the process does not have a reward then there is no incentive to continue the process.
A child who does not like art because they have no natural proclivity or inate tallent can come to enjoy art class if they learn a technique that has a payoff for them before frustrations ets in. Once that is acheived they will often be more willing to extend thier effort to acheive the payoff. The child that enjoys art and has a natural proclivity or inate tallent can be easily put off if there is no end reward or product/payoff.
I dont think that one is more important than the other, they are both important, and the degree to which is more important is variable.