I think this is a valuable post and do not have time to respond properly to it, as I am heading out the door in a few minutes, but need to say.
It is wrong, totally wrong, to sell, what is purported to be a purebreed bird that is a cross bred bird. That is wrong, wrong, wrong. Did I mention that is wrong? If one does not know if the bird is PUREBREED or not, that person should be selling that bird as a cross, not a purebreed. sometimes purbreed birds can get mixed up with another breed, and the offspring will not be that purebreed, I can see that. Crap happens. I think most people know if they are selling a purebred bird or not, or should anyways. Period.
Now there is the purebreed bird that is not of great and huge quality and kind of looks like what that breed should look like, but is still a purebreed, that is another can of worms.
Now there is the purebreed bird that is mediocre, looks OK, looks kind of what the bird should look like, these are all according to the standard of the bird breed. That is another can of worms.
Then there is the exhibition quality of birds, that look like the breed should look like. That too is another can of worms.
So which can of worms are we opening here? I am confused by this topic and really want to say more, but just sure what to say.
I think the main point of all this is that whatever caliber of bird we have we need to let the public know, pictures of parent stock are very good.
This has probably gone off topic in my words too, but I agree with some of these posts, some I don't agree. I do not think anyone should sell a bird that could be a cross bred bird when it should be a purebreed bird and I agree, that should be made known, however it is.....gotta stop now, as I think my words are confusing my very tired mind, have a most beautiful day, CynthiaM.