farmchiq wrote: Arcticsun wrote:Helping the clubs put on a great event for everyone to show is seen as more important and a better use of funds than paying out to a select few.
In the shows I've been involved in, if money payouts are involved in some, but not all, classes, they are "jackpotted", meaning that part of each entry fee goes towards the payout.
Doesn't cost the club anything, and tends to encourage entries as the more entered, the higher the jackpot.
In order to Jackpot the classes the club either has to
1. Give up part of the entry fee from each bird, thereby having less money to pay for putting on the show , or...
2. Increase the cost of entering a bird. In which case we have been told by people that they will enter fewer birds
As an example, if a club is charging $3.50 per bird and that covers the cost of the judges and cage rental but not the rental of the facilities, shavings, feed, tables, cups, tar paper, skirting, advertising, insurance, etc etc etc, and then part of the entry fee, say 50 Cents goes towards a jackpot to give to the winners, then the club cannot afford to bring in a judge, or cannot afford to have cages etc. The number of birds does not significantly increase from the base expected number to offset the loss. To offset the 50 cents the club would need 1 extra bird for every three normal entries, that is an increase of 25% in entries!!!
If the club decided to Jackpot and charge $4 per bird, and the 50 cents goes towards jackpots, then we will receive fewer entries. I have been told by big name show people who entr lots of birds per show, that they would either NOT attend the show at all, thus the club would loose 50 to 100 or so entries from that one person alone, or many people would enter fewer birds, either way the club has less money from entries to pay for a good judge, a decent venue, etc etc.
Regardless, unless the club is wealthy and has access to free cages, good venues at a reasonable price, cheap advertising, cheap ways of getting good judges, it costs the club.