Prairie Dog, I have had your words going through my head since that thread about ghastly hydro bills. I would like to pick your brain about windows, if that's okay. I would like to hear your take on it since you were/are part of the industry.
Of course, the discussion about windows being a heat liability in a home isn't as clear cut as all that. One must take into account placement of windows, size of windows, installation method, gaskets, caulking, and all sorts of other variables that affect a window's performance.
I have done some reading (not lots) on the different designs of window structure, vinyl, metal, wood cladding over plastics. There seems an endless number of complicated ways to design the edge bits that hold the glass in place. But what I have read, over and over again is that the glass itself, despite many changes in technology, is still a HUGE heat loss / heat gain in a house. Glass is glass is glass, with very little actual measurable improvements over the years.
This is not about window design, this is about glass. My limited reading makes the same conclusions. That triple glazed is better than double. THat gas (argon?) filled is better than not. Application of reflective foils improves heat deflection. But overall, the improvement in performance is very incremental and the vast leap in price for these 'fancy' windows is NOT reflected in a matching leap in performance. That you pay a steep premium for a not so steep improvement in heat loss/gain. The tests do NOT support the claims of vastly superior insulative quality. That even after all these years, glass is glass is glass and a window is essentially a big hole in your wall.
We have big picture windows looking out over the valley. As the temp takes a rapid drop, the cold air coming off those windows is sharply noticeable. I have been at the neighbour's house, he likes to point out his gas filled windows. On a cold night like tonight standing next to his, which cost a lot more than mine did, you still feel COLD air roiling off and blasting you in the face. As a consumer, I am NOT convinced that the higher price tag is at all justified by a minimal rise in performance. Either performance has to come way up, or price has to go way down, but there is a disconnect in there, for me anyway.
We are contemplating building new. I want to build to keep heat out in summer and in, in winter. If there is something I should consider when looking at new windows or placement of windows or square footage of windows or installation...I am all ears. Our windows now are cedar. When I went to Home Depot and asked for a 6 foot sliding glass door in cedar, the window man almost had a stroke. Apparently these are not a common item at Home Depot. WOuld you install wood, vinyl, metal???? What? How does one make best use of today's window technology?
Of course, the discussion about windows being a heat liability in a home isn't as clear cut as all that. One must take into account placement of windows, size of windows, installation method, gaskets, caulking, and all sorts of other variables that affect a window's performance.
I have done some reading (not lots) on the different designs of window structure, vinyl, metal, wood cladding over plastics. There seems an endless number of complicated ways to design the edge bits that hold the glass in place. But what I have read, over and over again is that the glass itself, despite many changes in technology, is still a HUGE heat loss / heat gain in a house. Glass is glass is glass, with very little actual measurable improvements over the years.
This is not about window design, this is about glass. My limited reading makes the same conclusions. That triple glazed is better than double. THat gas (argon?) filled is better than not. Application of reflective foils improves heat deflection. But overall, the improvement in performance is very incremental and the vast leap in price for these 'fancy' windows is NOT reflected in a matching leap in performance. That you pay a steep premium for a not so steep improvement in heat loss/gain. The tests do NOT support the claims of vastly superior insulative quality. That even after all these years, glass is glass is glass and a window is essentially a big hole in your wall.
We have big picture windows looking out over the valley. As the temp takes a rapid drop, the cold air coming off those windows is sharply noticeable. I have been at the neighbour's house, he likes to point out his gas filled windows. On a cold night like tonight standing next to his, which cost a lot more than mine did, you still feel COLD air roiling off and blasting you in the face. As a consumer, I am NOT convinced that the higher price tag is at all justified by a minimal rise in performance. Either performance has to come way up, or price has to go way down, but there is a disconnect in there, for me anyway.
We are contemplating building new. I want to build to keep heat out in summer and in, in winter. If there is something I should consider when looking at new windows or placement of windows or square footage of windows or installation...I am all ears. Our windows now are cedar. When I went to Home Depot and asked for a 6 foot sliding glass door in cedar, the window man almost had a stroke. Apparently these are not a common item at Home Depot. WOuld you install wood, vinyl, metal???? What? How does one make best use of today's window technology?