Dark Wing Duck wrote:I'm not sure I understand your rational Susan. Are you saying that you have (or have had) coccidiosis infected birds and in moderation exposure is GOOD for new birds? Why on earth would you want to risk exposing clean birds to that?!?! How do you gauge what is too little, too much or just enough exposure to such a deadly disease?!?!?!
Sorry, but I don't get it!
Coccidiosis is a lot like staph infection in humans in that it is carried by most, if not all chickens their entire lives. It is only when conditions are ripe for population explosion that Cocci. becomes an illness rather than just a carried bug. The same goes for Staph infection in humans.
Quite frankly, young birds exposed as early as possible can start building immunity as early as possible. For example, my Mom did everything she could to expose me to chicken pox at a young age. This included finding out someone's kid had it and sending me to play with children who had been exposed to said child but were not yet showing symptoms (as by the time you see it its not infectious). My Mom did this, not only because she's a somewhat lovingly twisted individual, but because adults who neglected to catch the pox when young can experience severe and dramatic, sometimes life threatening symptoms, versus most children who just end up covered in pink dots of calamine lotion with mittens on.
To me, medicating a newly hatched chick is like giving birth to a baby and starting them on a course of anti-biotics even if the baby is in perfect health. What are you fighting, why are out fighting? Continuing to feed medicated food, to me, is like keeping that child on antibiotics its entire life while keeping them away from any and all other children in order to prevent exposure to a flu bug or cold that may or may not be around. If something happened that that child suddenly HAD to go to the hospital (ie lost a finger, mangled a leg), that child would very likely be dead within days due to no immune system bombardment in life.
Its a personal choice for me, and I'm sure for Susan as well. Just like I won't put myself on meds, I won't put my chickens on it either. My faith in medications is nearly non-existant. I was hospitalized with salmonella poisoning 2 years ago. I won't get into graphic detail but I will say the pain literally crippled me and I thought, for the first time in my life, I was going to die. I was sent home from the hospital 5 hours later with a "stomach cold" and 5 different anti-biotics. The next morning I had a call from one of the doctors at the hospital wanting to know who released me and/or why I left. I had an extremely high count of Salmonella in my blood stream, which is very dangerous and late stage illness. He told me whatever anti-biotics I had been put on, come off them immediately. Drink water, eat if I can, sleep and try not to move unless I have to. Why no anti-biotics? Because salmonella has been fed so many antibiotic treatment, it's immune to over 95% of courses that are ran.
I can't help but feel medicating the animals we eat, as well as eachother, has done nothing but contribute to the epidemic. I sure don't wrong anyone for medicating, however it is strictly not for me.
As for the breeding program, any bird that survives an outbreak has gained resistance. Those that haven't will, and did, die. It is, plainly, that simple. Birds that show morbidity (ie get sick quicker) than others, will also be removed from my breeding program. Those who show little or no symptoms if/when there is an outbreak or conditions are ripe for them will stay.
It doesn't take a microscope to show what nature has perfected with years of natural selection.